Success criteria for a Statipedia pilot project

From Statipedia

Revision as of 19:45, 8 September 2010 by Meyer (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

With this list we're not setting a specific bar, but rather illustrating the kinds of things we can report on after a year. We do not prejudge what our managers want to do at that time.

1) a dozen active contributors; 2) 100 logins to interested readers ; 3) 1000 plainly useful pages (meaning a user could demo them and it would be clear to a member of our community why the page is useful) ; 3) no coercion 4) high morale 5) low levels of conflict (taking as given that this is a system for CHANNELING conflict constructively) ; 6) near-zero expenses ; 7) effective process for extending and using functionality (add-ons) 8) no rule-breaking (e.g. inappropriate content online ; sharing of a login id) 9) it was useful to somebody – e.g. we get a fan letter from a new person 10) new users do not need to invest a lot to use it (training is effective, or not needed)

    (goal: easy to learn & easy to use)

11) works adequately with existing systems (interoperability)

Personal tools